You do not have do download something from you do not know where, and do not know when it will start crashing. It is the only one complete, official stock boxed simulation set on the market. To my opinion huge benefits of Falcon 4.0 Allied Force are:ฤก. So, everything is relative and both F4:AF and other derivations of Falcon 4.0 are enough realistic for medium to high skilled simulation fans. As well as realism remarks, F-16 is a military combat aircraft so simulation makers can have diffirent views at what is real or not but do not know the actual reality. So your comparison of plain stock out of the box F4:AF and Freefalcon is not absolutely fair. I don't understand those complaining about bad graphics of Falcon 4.0:Allied Force, in order to get really great graphics you need a good PC capable of running a 1650x1050 32 Bit or even bigger resolution, buy and install Hitiles, Aeyes widescreen cockpits for all flyable F-16s as well as widescreen loading/debriefing files. EricTerminator wrote:But the graphics are in my opinion 2-3 years ahead of F4 AF
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |